More and more people today are visiting extreme places such as Antarctica or the Sahara desert. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such travels?
In the contemporary era, many people are interested in extreme travelling visits such as Antarctica and the Sahara desert. This issue carries out both benefits and drawbacks which I will elucidate more in the forthcoming paragraph.
To begin with, the most beneficial of taking a trip with dire consequences is gaining more knowledge and lifetime experience. Areas such as Antarctica are extravagantly beautiful along with the variety of natural phenomena (Aurora). This typical area not found anywhere else most likely becomes our best instagram posts. Secondly, safari adventure brings travellers back to the date of ancient civilization. Tour of Siwa city in Egypt, for instance, brings them to mesmerise custom houses and oases as a resource of past life.
Moving to the disadvantages, the primary one is that the pile of plastic waste produced by human activities in such areas significantly reaches an alarming rate. Along with domestic waste ending up in the ocean known as Great Pacific Garbage Patch, marine debris injures the gastrointestinal tract of rare species, Paus Orca. Consequently, the number of their death rate may cut off the existence of habitats and ecosystems in Antarctica. Furthermore, for the sake of human safety, such travelling endangers themselves, particularly ones without well-prepared training and equipment. It appears that many poison species (Scorpion and Nubian Cobra) which hide inside the swamp of sand, for example, are proven dangerous animals that exist in the Sahara Desert.
In conclusion, there are enormous advantages for tourists to visit unusual places such as broader insight and unique experiences once in a life. Meanwhile, some possible disadvantages include the disruption of ecological balance as well as the huge risk of severe injuries.
- In some cultures children are encouraged to compete against each other What are the advantages and disadvantages of this approach 84
- Friendships that take place online are not as meaningful as those where people meet each other face to face To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Over the last few decades the media has promoted the image of young thin women as being ideal What problems has this caused What solutions can you suggest for this issue 89
- Some people believe that when designing a building the most important thing to be considered is the function rather than the outward appearance To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays people tend to have children at an older age Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47841726619 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97249654802 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687050359712 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2574576384 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288979907419 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081918505965 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104515942631 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172880473112 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10234245433 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.