Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In recent decades, the question of whether animal experimentation should be conducted or be banned has sparked a controversy among the public. Although testing on animals is conducive to humankind, I believe that this should be replaced by alternative methods due to ethical issues.
There are a myriad of compelling reasons why animal testing is mandatory. Firstly, since there are few similarities of gene structure between human and animals, if the drug cures animal, it could be a treatment for people. For example, with the assistance of animal testing, scientists are able to put a step forward in medical progress, thus, an increasing number of new remedies are created such as vaccines for HIV, which save billions of human lives. Secondly, in order to minimize animal sufferings, researchers will not conduct experiments unless they are excessively demanding. In fact, testing for cosmetic industry is now restrictively banned in a variety of countries, namely Japan or New Zealand.
However, the downside of animal testing appears far more significant. First of all, it is acknowledged that while conducting experimentation, people will subject animals to trauma and reduce the quality or even the length of their lives, albeit humans have no moral rights to do these activities. Second, we can take alternative methods of data analysis, including computer models and studying cell structures rather than the whole animal as benefits of research using animal do not justify sufferings caused.
In conclusion, although animal testing brings certain advantages, it is imperative for government to ban these experiments on non-medical products with the purpose of alleviate sufferings to animals. However, I hold a belief that there are still alternative ways to test medicine.
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private company To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- More and more people today want to buy goods e g clothes and smartphones with well known brand names Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favour of th 84
- Some people say that the best way to improve road safety would be to increase minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- For many employers formal academic qualifications are becoming more important than experience Why is that Is it a positive or negative development 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In recent decades, the question of whether animal experimentation should be conduc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...s due to ethical issues. There are a myriad of compelling reasons why animal testin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46043165468 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01748608895 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658273381295 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7606492071 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278956332633 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09715868429 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475108699189 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166707017667 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195885787645 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In recent decades, the question of whether animal experimentation should be conduc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...s due to ethical issues. There are a myriad of compelling reasons why animal testin...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46043165468 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01748608895 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658273381295 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7606492071 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278956332633 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09715868429 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475108699189 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166707017667 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195885787645 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.