More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes, car and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In contemporary society, most people tend to buy something from well-known companies such as buying clothes and car. There are some factors leading to these attitudes, but I think this trend brings some negatives development.
There are some reasons for this phenomenon. First of all, when customers buy a product from famous brands, they can exact about the product quality, such as, lady buys clothes or other items for them and their husband, and they are sure that the clothes which are excellent quality. Moreover, some wealthy people are willing to buy some products which are expensive because they want to look trendy and show off their status. For instance, famous companies rent famous actors to advert their products such as a car or other items, and this will create a trend. As a result, some young people who really love their Idol, they will imitate their Idol by possessing what they wear and look like famous people.
I believe that this trend will bring some negative development for social. Firstly, this trend affects to young people because they are very young and cannot awareness about using the money, such as, they cannot earn money, however, they are willing to buy expensive clothes. This reduces the financial of their parents. This leading to they can become a crime; they will steal money from their parent to buy this item. Secondly, People who just buy a car, clothes or other items from well-known brands, this will make small companies cannot develop and expand their products to people. For example, people buy a car from some popular foreign companies, as a result, some domestically business collapse because they cannot find profit to fill up their finances.
To sum up, the growing consumption of famous brands can explain that people want to look fashionable and trendy. However, I think that there are bring some disadvantages and not the positives trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-01 | Lâm Kim Yến | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | Lâm Kim Yến | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | lee giang | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | huongthuy890 | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | kuldeep sharma | 40 | view |
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films are entertain. But others say films should have educational value. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- Many people say that family is the most powerful influence on a child’s development. However, some people suppose that other factors (such as music, friends,…) have a great influence on children. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 73
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops 74
- The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 56
- Most artists earn low salaries and should, therefore, receive funding from the government in order for them to continue with their work. To what extent do you agree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'negatives'' or 'negative's'?
Suggestion: negatives'; negative's
...des, but I think this trend brings some negatives development. There are some reasons ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'brought'.
Suggestion: brought
...trendy. However, I think that there are bring some disadvantages and not the positive...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, look, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, such as, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01892744479 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34271682132 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485804416404 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9143542802 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.066666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18664327939 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769413806867 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038136687822 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137218488866 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218276827229 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.