More people put their personal information online (address, telephone number,…) for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In today's digital age, an increasing number of individuals are willingly sharing their personal information online for various purposes, such as socializing on social networks or conducting banking transactions. While some argue that this trend has positive implications, I firmly believe that the consequences outweigh the benefits.
Firstly, the widespread sharing of personal information raises significant privacy concerns. With the growing threat of cybercrime and identity theft, individuals who disclose their addresses, telephone numbers, or other sensitive details are more susceptible to unauthorized access and potential misuse of their data. Cybercriminals can exploit this information to carry out fraudulent activities, causing severe financial and emotional distress to victims. Therefore, this trend poses a serious threat to personal privacy and security.
Moreover, the online sharing of personal information has adverse effects on social dynamics. By making private details readily available, individuals expose themselves to potential harassment, stalking, and unwanted solicitations. It erodes the boundaries between public and private life, leading to intrusion and feelings of vulnerability. Furthermore, the pressure to maintain an online presence often results in individuals comparing themselves to others, which can contribute to low self-esteem and mental health issues. In this way, the trend of extensive personal information sharing hampers healthy human interactions and negatively affects individuals' overall well-being.
Lastly, the proliferation of personal information online opens the door to data exploitation by corporations and advertisers. Companies actively collect and analyze user data to create targeted advertisements, profiting from the sale of personal information without adequate transparency or consent. This commodification of personal data reduces individuals to mere consumers, compromising their autonomy and agency. Consequently, this development not only compromises privacy but also perpetuates a culture of surveillance capitalism, where users are constantly monitored and manipulated.
In conclusion, the growing trend of people sharing their personal information online for everyday activities raises serious concerns. The negative consequences outweigh any perceived benefits, as it compromises privacy, undermines social dynamics, and enables data exploitation by corporations
- Some people think children have the freedom to make mistakes while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes Discuss both sides and give your opinion 56
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Some people argue job satisfaction is more important than job security Others believe a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- More people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.52147239264 5.12529762239 127% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3051602774 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613496932515 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0951290952 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.058823529 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287784119995 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862027606019 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896985828914 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170968385449 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794281768855 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 9.89 50.2224549098 20% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.54 12.4159519038 165% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.36 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.