The bar chart shows the average size class in primary schools and lower secondary schools in 6 countries compared to the world average in 2006.
The chart reflects the average number of pupils per class in primary schools and lower secondary schools in six specific countries in comparison with the figure of the world in 2006.
Overall, the global average number of pupils who attended in lower secondary schools was higher than that of primary learners. In addition, two Asian countries, detailedly South Korea and Japan, had the larger average class size in both schools than the other countries in the given chart in specific and the world in general.
In terms of primary schools, it is noticeable that six figures were all under 35 pupils per class. Specifically, the figures of South Korea, Japan and the UK were superior to the world average, about 34, 29 and 27 pupils respectively. Furthermore, it was Mexico that the average size of class made up the least of the world, precisely 20 pupils.
Regarding the secondary learners, the chart demonstrates that almost all given countries’ class capacity were also less than 35 pupils, excepting for South Korea. While Japan, Mexico ranked respectively second and third , the others’ average numbers were lower than that of the world. Besides, only around 17 pupils attended a class in the UK, which was also the lowest figure of six countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ico ranked respectively second and third , the others’ average numbers were lower ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, third, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03827751196 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55872080427 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521531100478 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2235228285 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 5.23603664747 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398639664041 0.215688989381 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179970710584 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146999457142 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303257857526 0.15604864568 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155478033032 0.0819641961636 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.