Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer.
Do you agree or disagree?
Art has been playing a crucial part in human’s evolution, thus having a place to illustrate and restore these materials is indispensable. However, some individuals opine that people should consider using the bleeding-edge technology to observe the historical objects and artistic works rather than pay a visit to public museums or art exhibitions. From my vantage point, I utterly disapprove of the opinion, which will be dissected with specific rationales before my personal viewpoint is put forward.
To commence with, it is evident that we should praise the values of museums and art galleries due to their historical and economic importance. First, by directly watching actual and ancient masterpieces, people are able to comprehend fully the background history with detailed explanations from exhibitions’ guidances. Dwellers also have a chance to ask a variety of questions about exhibited objects, which is regarded as an active methodology to obtain novel knowledge, especially for not only local students but also worldwide ones. Second, the exhibitions provide continuous revenues for local people as it creates such compelling destinations for both national and global tourists. Hence, maintaining the illustrated places would positively impact the economy of nations as well as improving the welfare of local citizens.
In contrast, utilizing the computers for art pursuit is not a negative option at all. These days, thanks to the significant advancement of technology, detailedly the VR technique, loads of historical and artistic objects are demonstrated in 3D versions and stored on digital markets. Therefore, the long-distance predicaments of those fancying museums and arts widespread can be solved with ease. Additionally, several art galleries have applied cutting-edge technology to improve the quality of these cyber versions to enrich the diversity and meet the viewers’ requirements.
In conclusion, ubiquitous museums and art galleries have numerous merits to the country’s economy and historical preservation due to aforementioned reasons. Governments should encourage the usage of modern technology into exhibition’s illustrations in order to nurture the values of restored objects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80733944954 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23663287201 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654434250765 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8624117798 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.642857143 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244520393256 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763687954201 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706336951342 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141329927684 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053994891817 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.1 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.