NO FUTURE FOR RADIO
It is often said that no more using of radio in the future, whereas other people think that radio will be more essential in the future. Both perspectives have merits and drawbacks, as this will demonstrate.
Generally speaking, there are several reasons why people seems that no future for radio. Firstly, in the age of visual media, radio is gradually becoming obsolete. For instance, many people prefer smart systems in their car in order to watch some entertainment rather than listening radio stations. Perhaps another reason is that many radio stations are out of touch with their audience and fail to improve on-air content. If someone asks the people questions about popular tv channel programmes, people, generally, come with good answer, on contrary, when it comes to radio programmes, that may be responded by less people so, majority of people interested in visual programmes. For that reason, it seems by people not a bright future about radio.
Despite these arguments, many people feel that radio will be aspect of our live in the future for a number of reasons. Listening to the radio in their car will remain the commuter’s favourite activity for decades to come. For example, visual things such as screens as an mean to watch somethings are always distracted to people while they are driving and that causes many accidents, thus, the listening may be better option while driving. More and more people enjoy listening to radio online via a computer or smartphone. Normally if you want to listen a specific radio channel, you need to be in their frequency range to be able to listen the channel. Online radio system no demanding that request and users are able to listen the channel wherever they been. Many radio stations have short range issue to listen but, with using the internet radio, radio lovers are able to listen their favourite radio stations.
To summarize, the radio provides with many benefits for bright future, yet it also has the negativity to spurs the next decade.
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- Some people say that because of the internet it is no longer necessary to learn facts about some subjects like history and science Do you agree or disagree 73
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language still could be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 612, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...io programmes, that may be responded by less people so, majority of people intereste...
^^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ample, visual things such as screens as an mean to watch somethings are always dis...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97321428571 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46169456308 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529761904762 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5674650729 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396421857924 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158561990488 0.084324248473 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121948093393 0.0667982634062 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239682318925 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832582528442 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.