Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the contemporary world, animal testing has been using widely to help advance medical research and examine the safety of many products. This frequently generates a heated debate with supporters remaining that it is vital to humanity, whilst opponents claim that we should ban such things because we have no moral right to justify the pain animals have to go through. In my personal opinion, I believe that animal experiments should be limited and use for medical research only. This essay will first demonstrate that enhancing medical knowledge as the merit, followed by how the primary liability, namely the suffering caused, is valid and thus, animal testing should be limited.
There is an argument of justification, which demonstrates the statement to wit; animal testing is supported because it plays an essential role in advancing medical research. The rationale behind this is that many medical discoveries involved experimental on animals. According to the PEW Center, 76% of animal functions are comparable with human and therefore, experts could limit unwanted outcomes or test the effect of certain kinds of medicines.
Nonetheless, it is imperative to reminisce that there are companies that routinely used animal experiments to test the safety of their products and people do not agree that this act is necessary. This borne by the fact that they could use alternative methods of research because some of them are cosmetic or food companies. The Times recently reported that testing for the cosmetic industry is now banned in many countries.
From my point of view, I believe that animal testing should only use for important medical research. A logical justification for this is I do not see that testing the safety of non-medical products on animals justifies suffering caused. However, if they are used for medical purposes, it worth the pain as the moments they have been suffered could in return, save millions of people.
Subsequently, weighing all the aforementioned, this can be safely stated that we should only allow authorities to use animals for medical research after considering tangible benefits this could bring for humanity and that other industries can use alternative ways to examine the safety of their products.
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school Do the advantage outweigh the disadvantage 73
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce traffic in big cities 78
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school Do the advantage outweigh the disadvantage 73
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in our everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 73
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 376, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
... pain animals have to go through. In my personal opinion, I believe that animal experiments shou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3008356546 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80937414392 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540389972145 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.3391272187 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.928571429 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6428571429 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285557338256 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108000744917 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592763106337 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165886715151 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564930297202 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.