Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?
The new millennium has brought significant changes to people's lifestyle in terms of mitigating mundane burden, and one of the most of them is cooking food. According to economic and social statistics conducted by North American scientists indicate that modern means of preparing food have increased the labor productivity as well as encouraged time-saving of individuals.
Productivity is one of the most important factors, which determine an organization's performance, in a business. In the past, clerks had to spend relatively more time for making meal than their today's counterparts due to the fact that lack of advanced contrivances; those allow owners to prepare food quicker. In contrast, such modern contrivances as microwaves, electric ovens and coffee machines are both available and affordable for most individuals giving opportunities to allocate less time for preparing food and to focusing more on jobs. Thus, the more it is easier to make meal, the more the productivity increases.
Moreover, not only the equipments have reduced the time for cooking food but also a myriad of processed foods available on stocks nowadays has mitigated the burden. My single brother, for instance, usually buys half-cooked products because he is not able to cook for himself; however, he hopes to find a girlfriend who would prepare home food for him. Nevertheless, these kinds of foods are considered to be detrimental to human health since processed foods are likely to contain ingredients, restrain the food to be fresh for a long time; which, in turn, cause cancer, according to WHO.
The breakthrough in preparing food nowadays has already affected individuals' lifestyle in a positive way; however, it might have some drawbacks in terms of health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-30 | Nehaa Sharma | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | eppa akhil | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | Arti Singh | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | Hakodate | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | ekamdeeps | 56 | view |
- The line graph below shows the annual number of visits to Australia by overseas tourists. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the tourists came from. 67
- The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing, including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stages to enable adjustment. 73
- Safety standards are important when building people's homes. Who should be responsible for enforcing strict building codes - the government or the people who build the houses. 67
- To solve ever-increasing environmental hazards throughout the world, the best way is to increase the price of fuel. What is your opinion on the above assumption? 84
- Eating sweet foods produces acid the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values) 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: Whom
...ch, in turn, cause cancer, according to WHO. The breakthrough in preparing food ...
^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...dy affected individuals apos; lifestyle in a positive way; however, it might have some drawbacks ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...have some drawbacks in terms of health.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for instance, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3074204947 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95560174337 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614840989399 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.586657794 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.2 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts,knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144177577142 0.244688304435 59% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614657429826 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433528162667 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940531105741 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280126695071 0.056905535591 49% => paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.