Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
It is said that nowadays home remedies and herbal treatments have grown in importance, and many individuals prefer not to visit doctors. In my view, this development is not positive.
There are several reasons why some people are fans of herbal medicine or home therapies. Such individuals believe that these types of treatment are healthier, as they are made from natural materials and they have neither active nor chemical ingredients. Also, it seems herbal therapy or other alternative treatments are more cost-effective because all people without any medical background can easily search the internet to learn how to use them. However, I believe that such therapies are the only appropriate precautions which can protect people from getting sick and help individuals to be healthy. In other words, such treatments are only good to keep people health-conscious.
I highly support the idea that prescribed medicine by doctors cannot be replaced by home remedies or other alternative treatments. It will take people more time to get better when they decide to avoid visiting a doctor. Additionally, such medicines can also lead to drug toxicity, as many people do not know the amount of dose that they have to use. As a result, they may overdose, and their illness becomes worse. This is because the majority of websites are misleading, and the information given by them is written by some people who do not have valid medical qualifications. So, most of the time the treatment offered by them not only cannot improve the wellness of people but also can evoke other pains in their bodies which can be irreparable.
In conclusion, in my view, it is wrong if ill people use alternative treatments without visiting doctors.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, in conclusion, as a result, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11660777385 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87393655005 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551236749117 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8705336223 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.428571429 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21137527055 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788239311197 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317468643862 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138880831584 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232676829641 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.