Nowadays more and more older people compete with younger people for the same jobs. What are the
reasons for this. What are the solutions to solve this?
It is a recent trend among the elderly that, they need to do the same job as youngsters. The main reason behind this is due to the public status and social prestige, but it is tackled by retirement programs and pensions.
To begin with, the causative factors, many older people suffering from crisis related to money, minimised public values and lack of self-esteem. They often think that old age may inhibit the handling of many situations and youth would manage perfectly may lead to the conflict between the employees. Similarly, retirement would mitigate their status and living standards in society, therefore they trying to cope with the young people to stay long in the same position with others. For instance, politicians always remained in the field to compete in elections with youths for continuing their public position at a high level. Furthermore, some elder generations are suffering from loss of support and services from others after they quit the job. So they need to continue with their juniors to stay the same stand as before.
However, proper retirement programs and proposals along with personal protection might reduce this problem to the core. Such as, provide pensions and ensure the advantages of schems would minimise the elders insecurity to some extend. Includes advice and opinions of older generations in civil services instead of compete as an election candidate. In addition, ensure their role in society through participation in various other areas, and provide financial support and analyse their self esteem through some sort of programs. Make sure their self relience and assess daily needs to be well managed. Moreover, respect and convince their position in peoples mind would be constant and most importantly educate their limitations of old age when they compete to the youngsters position.
To sum up, it is natural to elder ones have a competition to the youngsters for the position and job for stability and concern in society. Though handle with care and intelligence would be resolve the problems.
- Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clean up the pollution that they produce not the government To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of areas such as fashion and consumer goods To what extent do you agree 73
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009
- The table below shows the level of people specialists in various kinds of enterprises in 1990 2000and 2010 73
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behaviour. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'elders'' or 'elder's'?
Suggestion: elders'; elder's
...advantages of schems would minimise the elders insecurity to some extend. Includes adv...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
... minimise the elders insecurity to some extend. Includes advice and opinions of older ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... To sum up, it is natural to elder ones have a competition to the youngsters for...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, may, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, sort of, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18674698795 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61740575573 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581325301205 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0619584015 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18421867636 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577789585527 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446807140402 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11301007352 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287502506123 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.