Nowadays, people have little awareness of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world?
Generating profits and boosting the economic growth seem to be prioritized by humans in the modern era, as a result, fewer people are responsibly aware of their natural surroundings. Most environmental issues stem from humans’ manufacturing activities but little concern has been raised. Analyzed in the essay are the reasons for this attitude together with various methods that help trigger more knowledge about the natural world.
To commence with, although individuals have an inclination to exploit the resources that the environment offers, they are likely to forget the importance of preserving it, which can be attributed to several points. First, the rapid growth of the economy and advancement of technology has gradually improved the general living standards, resulting in consumerism and materialistic lifestyles. People indulge themselves in the convenience brought by modern developments so much that they even have no comprehension of their adverses influences on the natural world. The hectic pursuit of materials and comfortable lives have utterly drawn them away from caring for the nature surrounding them. Additionally, the depreciation of the natural world also results from the subjective attitudes of people. Due to the lack of knowledge, loads of people still believe that the resources they are utilizing these days are renewable. Thus, hardly anyone pays attention to saving energy or natural sources; they freely dispose of their waste without knowing that they are damaging the environment.
For the aforementioned reasons above, individuals, especially young ones, should upgrade their knowledge about the ecosystem through several approaches. In fact, there is a wide scope of natural programmes on television, be it Wildlife program, which illustrates a multitude of material relating to the natural world’s status along with real documentaries about many species. Hence, people need to utilize this source of knowledge to acquire pertinent knowledge. Besides, taking an eco-tour is a great method for dwellers who are into outside activities. Tourists are able to directly observe the nature and interact with creatures from the habitat while enjoying their trip completely.
In conclusion, the sky-rocketed growth of every aspect of human life together with subjective attitudes contribute largely to the lacking attention of dwellers towards the ecosystem. Thus, searching the material through media or being involved in ecotourism are suggested to fully comprehend about the present environment.
- More and more people want to buy clothes cars and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 81
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 73
- The bar chart shows the average size class in primary schools and lower secondary schools in 6 countries compared to the world average in 2006 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 706, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e nature surrounding them. Additionally, the depreciation of the natural world al...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, so, still, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7328042328 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9840906317 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621693121693 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1459870804 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.470588235 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2352941176 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290778069976 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806151380995 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067289204924 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161226831034 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865291485786 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.