Nowadays people try to balance their work with other things in life, but only some could actually achieve it so far.
What are the reasons for that? How can we solve this problem?
Having work-life balance is becoming a concern among people these days. The majority of people struggle to have a balance between their work and life; however, it seems to be a little bit unachievable to all of them. To illustrate this, the main causes of this phenomenon will be discussed and, finally, some measures will be suggested to tackle this issue.
Firstly, it would appear that having a work-life balance is a demanding procedure in this crowded and competitive environment. For example, many people in developed countries such as the UK and the US opt the modern lifestyle which is required to have a full-time job alongside extra work, out of official time (8 AM to 5 PM), so they probably reduce some recreational activities in order to have modern and luxuriant life. This shows that they would have an imbalance between life and work. Moreover, living in a mega-police city such as Tehran, force you to focus just on your business even though it damages your work-life balance because one needs to be stable in the competitive market. In short, opting modern lifestyle and living in the megacities is bound to having the work-life imbalance.
To tackle the problems, likely this trend requires a joint effort between governments and people. For instance, the UK banned the working hours out of official time and enforce some strict law in order to make a balance between people’s life and work. Although people take step alongside the government and decide to have an easy life than more modern lifestyle. In other words, the government restrict the employers and introduce some compulsory rules to allow the employees to have more pastime and togetherness with their families, and people preferred to have work-life balance by choosing easy items for their lives.
To conclude, balancing the life and work in this digital and modern era seems to be difficult; however, a minority of people could achieve it. This essay argued perhaps the main reasons for this phenomenon and suggested some measures to overcome this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-19 | Architecture | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-17 | Architecture | 73 | view |
- Some people think subjects taught in school are a waste of time, while others disagree and believe that this type of education is useful for students.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Nowadays people try to balance their work with other things in life, but only some could actually achieve it so far.What are the reasons for that? How can we solve this problem? 73
- Some people prefer cold weather conditions, while others don’t.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Analyze both sides of this argument. 73
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ork and life; however, it seems to be a little bit unachievable to all of them. To illustr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...some measures to overcome this problem.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in short, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02941176471 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68217878692 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1900276297 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30056924201 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11945062238 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561819140344 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210444305861 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466988166809 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.