Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Do you agree/disagree with this view?
These days, people have different views on the importance of higher degrees. Regarding hiring candidates, some recruiters give more stress on scholastic qualifications than personal traits or soft skills. In my opinion, I am not in favour of this view.
Undoubtedly, professional degrees play a vital role in looking for new workers. First, it proves that person gone through professional training before applying for a job as people are looking for clothes or appearance first. For instance, almost recruiters pay more attention to a piece of paper in the Cv than life experiences or soft skills. Moreover, with higher degrees, employees can receive a handsome pay as well as work in comfortable atmosphere. Therefore, they can have a chance to improve numerous abilities involving their job as much as possible.
However, when hiring candidates, employees must give more value to practical skills and personal abilities than qualifications. Apart from professional skills, workers need to own some good personal traits such as creativity, loyalty or hard-working. In fact, it hardly to assess workers have those traits or not if recruiters look for university degrees. Furthermore, there are some accidental situations while working that require candidates also solve in a smart way by using their hands-on skills as well as practical experience. It is undoubted that those skills are not teached in schools.
As a result, there are an amount of suitable methods which need to be applied when recruiting new employers like questionairs or lunch time to check team-work abilities and personal abilities of each person. Those methods are quite straightforward and easy to perform. To sum up, when selecting new employees, recruiters need to depends on either personal traits or scholastic qualifications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | anhminhbnvn1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | linhdung01 | 50 | view |
- Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Do you agree/disagree with this view? 78
- Nowadays, some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees. Why is it the case? Do you agree/disagree with this view? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a smart way" with adverb for "smart"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...king that require candidates also solve in a smart way by using their hands-on skills as well ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...n schools. As a result, there are an amount of suitable methods which need to be ap...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'depend'.
Suggestion: depend
...cting new employees, recruiters need to depends on either personal traits or scholastic...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, for instance, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43262411348 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08685855517 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599290780142 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0987758334 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6875 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239838255396 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070002281852 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442567996335 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140311699952 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309143768624 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.