Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?Give reasons for your answer and inclu

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In the present context, technology has been increasing exponentially worldwide , which has drastically changed the lifestyles of people. Nowadays, the methods of communication and interaction have been significantly evolved due to the use of technology. I strongly believe that technology have dramatically replaced the traditional means of communication, which were used by people few decades ago. This essay will discuss impacts of technology in relationships that people make.

To begin with, definitely in this era, no one can keep themselves away from the technology, which has become a important part of almost everyone’s life. Although, technological development is increasing rapidly globally there are both merits as well as demerits of technology. Firstly, one of the evident benefit of using technology is that today, it is possible to be in-touch with everyone easily and quickly with the aid of smart phones and internet. In past, people used letters, telegraphs and telephones to interact with each other was quite time consuming, but now with the touch of bottom it is possible to chat with everyone. For instance, social networks such as face book, instagram, twitter and so on have greatly affected communication areas. Moreover, technology is helping to develop more personal bonds and relationships.

However, there are obvious negative impact of technological development which have become controversial topic these days. The most significant drawback is that the criminal activities are sharply increasing. Likewise, people are giving less importance to their family, but spending hours on social networks with new friends. Moreover, fake relationships are mostly emerging as a result of technological advancement.

In conclusion, technology has considerably affected the ways in which people interact with each others. From my point of view, technology has become integral part of our life, but it should be used wisely and properly.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... been increasing exponentially worldwide , which has drastically changed the lifes...
^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...y from the technology, which has become a important part of almost everyone'...
^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... rapidly globally there are both merits as well as demerits of technology. Firstly, one of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...h the aid of smart phones and internet. In past, people used letters, telegraphs and te...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66554054054 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19601166845 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614864864865 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1244813233 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.8125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310834649939 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961134051791 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743598008136 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18528959962 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296551731379 0.056905535591 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.