Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of personal relationships?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
Although not new in modern life, the way man communicate with each other has changed dramatically due to the advances in technology. Technology has effected personal’s relationships in many ways, this trend has both positive and negative development.
Given the fact that current world becoming modern than they used to in the past, electronic devices provide chance for everyone have a disscussion with other people in long distance more easier. Network enables people to do lot of things. For instance, they can run a bussiness by opening an online shop on website, create a place for entertainment that everyone could take part in and due to the quaratine, student can study online without going to school or extra classes. The one who has been abroad or relatives can facetime with family thanks to the internet.
However, there are some disadantages in this digital age. The fear that human species might become robots without emotions. Spending hours surfing on the internet, reading Facebook news on daily basis. Man sooner or later will become more and more passive. There are some people who are unemployed because they are spending time to surf the internet, have no interaction with other people, addicted to game or virtual character. People depend on technology, rarely face to face with friends . Some of the situation we can see in life that most teenagers when hang out with friends usually look at their phone and do not communicate or look around while walking.
All in all, the existence of technology has influenced people in many ways and this has both positive and negative consequences.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of personal relationships Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 81
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...sion with other people in long distance more easier. Network enables people to do lot of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nology, rarely face to face with friends . Some of the situation we can see in lif...
^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...ogy, rarely face to face with friends . Some of the situation we can see in life that most ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06766917293 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66957927039 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62030075188 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7166283117 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2857142857 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292641620984 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888029305733 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961522698954 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208994134884 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123721272367 0.056905535591 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.