As the number of cars, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the user should cover the costs. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is the cost that is paid for infrastructure that should be nation's responsibility. Nevertheless, a number of people claim that this money oughts to be charged by drivers. This writing will discuss both views and demonstrate the writer's point of view.
On the one hand, people embrace plenty of convincing roots to believe that nation should take on this cost. To begin with, the imposed taxation which gains from residents should be spent on upgrading the people's standard of living. It means that the authority might take on this cost to carry out road maintenance regularly in order to ease traffic congestion and improve road safety. In addition, the cost paid for the improvement of transportation systems seems beyond citizen's financial capicity. Predominantly roads and other inadequate infrastructures that are built out of the national budget.
On the other hand, the cost paid for this trend by the user could also seem like their social responsibility. Firstly, the cost covered by the user could develop their concern the road. Most road accidents also might decline due to the driver avoids destroying what they have to spend money on. Secondly, residents using private vehicles might pay for benefits that they derive when the others tend to utilize public transports. The emission from not only personal transportation but also traffic congestion destroys environment and the user seems to take responsibility for this.
From the writer's point of view, I am prone to the statement that government should cover this cost. I believe that governments might allocate budgets more reasonably than citizens in order to improve living standards.
In conclusion, there are several attractive reasons for people to claims that government or the user should take on the cost paid for road systems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-10 | ozair | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | ozair | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | lehonganh1212 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | nhinhi999 | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-01 | Duy-Truong Quach | 78 | view |
- Some employees think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience when they look for employers Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
- As the number of cars more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Many people today are choosing to travel abroad to other country Why is this happening Is this positive or negative 67
- Modern technology is believed to help shoppers much while others do not think so Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 67, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'claim'.
Suggestion: claim
...everal attractive reasons for people to claims that government or the user should take...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25773195876 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83000905308 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556701030928 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.8929088591 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.625 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372673803128 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123627372596 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057991160375 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221083846245 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476044923539 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.