The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones. What problems can this create? What are some solutions?
To work is to live independently and to survive in society. Nowadays, that senior citizens have to compete against their junior counterparts for better job positions is rampant, especially, in metropolises where the job market is in high demand. This trend definitely has some impacts, but it can be tackled effectively with a few simple steps.
There are some negative consequences stemming from this unfair competition. Firstly, due to the fact that ageing always ensues (results in) with the deterioration in health and performance, old people have to suffer certain disadvantages when they apply for jobs, even if they possessed the same qualifications and skills compared with the young. Secondly, old-timers usually face the catch 22 situations. Specifically, they try to maintain their positions and thrive against the young in the workplace by undertaking more projects and assignments; however, working excessively can put them at greater risk of acquiring mental disorder or physical fatigue that is negatively linked to their job performances. Moreover, this drawback also makes senior workers more vulnerable to cutbacks as companies tend to retain younger ones who often ensure (generate) higher productivity and display better morale.
There are a few solutions that can be taken by both enterprises and governments. For the old, lack of physical superiority (strength) is compensated by work experience accumulated throughout the years, which means that companies should delegate them the task of providing training to newly - recruited workers. This approach is not only physically and mentally more suitable to the old but it also maintains their respectable role in society as those who instil knowledge and motivation to later generations. Furthermore, governments can take an active role by opening (introducing) free courses that help older applicants update their skills and qualifications. Although the older job applicants become, the narrower their career prospects are, there would always be vacancies available for those equipped with adequate technical skills.
In conclusion, it is true that age discrimination in the job market leads to some downfalls, but they can be dealt with if companies and governments are willing to offer help to the old.
- The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones. What problems can this create? What are some solutions? 89
- International travel has many advantages to both travellers and the country that they visited. Do Advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- Every one should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- 1. People should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live in a new country. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 11
- Prison is a common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime. However, a more effective solution is to provide people witha better education. Agree or disagree? 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52435530086 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06746455163 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624641833811 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.7938663861 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.714285714 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169746249518 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561715078928 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398810281014 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102801339078 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015768522334 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.