Online communication is becoming more popular than face-to-face communication.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In the past decade, as the development of science and technology, the Internet and social media have had a strong connection to our lives. Especially during the pandemic, online communication has become the most popular type of communication. This trend has caused a lot of contradictory opinions. It’s true that this trend has created a lot of value but nothing compared to its drawbacks.
Antagonists believe that online communication is human most useful tools to make more buddies or getting in touch with old friends. They do have their points. A lot of people had magically found and reached out to their childhood friends or lost relatives through well-known social media such as: Facebook or Instagram. We can also connect to relatives who live far away. Online conversations have proved its worth during the pandemic. Humans are social animals, we need to make connections in order to not feel isolated. Because of the undeniable spread of the Coronavirus, we can not hang out with our friends, or have any real-life conversations. So through social media, we can still send texts and video calls to our friends. Those actions have huge advantages on our mental health.
Despite its benefits, online communication also has many weaknesses. We all like to associate with cool friends. That is the reason why people tend to put on their best behaviors on social media which makes online connections feel like a catfish game that doesn’t build deep friendship. Firstly, we don’t know how our online friends really are, which is the cause of many problems. Many frauds will use online communication as a tool to get close to us and gain advantages for themselves. For example, trick us into joining bad-influence communities, or fool us into spilling out our personal information. Secondly, we only see others through their profile. That’s why many people try to make their images as glorious as possible. These days, just by strolling through Facebook or Instagram feeds make us feel not worthy. We tend to compare ourselves with the others, causing a huge self-doubt, peer pressure on our shoulders, which poisoned our mental health.
To conclude, we can’t deny all the benefits that online communication has brought to us, but nothing truly compares to real-life connections.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-19 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
- Some educationalists say every child should be taught to play musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to 3 different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- While some people consider global warming to be the most pressing environmental problem others believe that deforestation has a more devastating impact on our world Discuss both views and give your own opinion 70
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty in three states in USA 75
- The pie charts show the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15466666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8707803043 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565333333333 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 5.43587174349 294% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0800238471 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.5416666667 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128938747535 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041712690457 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656083517769 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909419820745 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012539433797 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.