Since the outbreak of coronavirus pandemic, online classes have become the cornerstone of education. Some people assert that e-learning will soon take over the traditional way of teaching and learning, while others do not agree. Despite these conflicting views, I would argue that online learning is far superior to on-campus education considering the following reasons.
To begin with, students can be free from facing time-consuming commute and save more time. Undeniably, students can get instant instruction and interaction from counselors and professors at school. However, students can also receive information from online learning, which is not much slower than the traditional way. In addition, students can avoid being caught in the traffic jams, which allows them to spend more time on assignments. What’s more, the money spent on transport can be used for other useful things such as stationery and snacks, and it is very beneficial to those who live far from their school.
Efficient teaching is another benefit of online learning. Admittedly, traditional learning creates a distraction-free environment for students because schools can forbid students from using smartphones and laptops where they can play online games. Nevertheless, e-learning platforms such as Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams allow students to record and save their online lectures in computers or smartphones. Therefore, if students cannot follow the pace of their classes or forget what they have learned, they can review the knowledge through watching the video files they have stored in their electronic devices. Under the context of the traditional learning, teachers are required to spend a great deal of time tracking students’ progress while errors might occur due to teachers’ fatigue. In contrast, computer-assisted teaching can effectively enhance accuracy. Cutting-edge technology not only reduces the workload of teachers but also helps students to know their mistakes immediately.
Scheduling flexibility is the very thing that conventional learning cannot supersede. Some people might assert that students can gain hands-on experience that comes from a physical classroom because they can do something by themselves and take detailed notes. Yet, there is no appropriate substitute for the convenience caused by online learning. For instance, whether a night owl or a morning person can log in and complete his or her homework anywhere, anytime. Also, online learning provides the disabled access to education, thereby narrowing the gap between the needy and the normal students.
In conclusion, both of two views have their cons and pros, but still, I maintain that online learning is indefinitely preferable, as its beneficial effects far outweigh the rest.
- In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals as food or other products such as medicines and clothing Do you agree or disagree 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay 91
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that it is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Nowadays in many countries woman have full time jobs therefore it is logical to share household task evenly between man and woman To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 89
- Some people believe that longer prison sentences are the best way to decrease crime while others believe that there are alternative ways to decrease crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2354.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 419.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61813842482 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94930905631 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608591885442 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 708.3 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1296826349 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.095238095 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9523809524 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163926959101 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523212730263 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049290148705 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105508411565 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463276562021 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.