Small businesses are disappearing and being replaced by large multinational companies. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Some studies report that the disappearance of small companies is occurring increasingly under the dominance of large multinational corporations that are becoming wider. Although this condition may be advantageous to a certain extent, I believe that its limitations still are much more significant.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that the market predominant by large businesses brings some particular benefits. One of them is that the expansion of these companies can establish a union among countries around the world. In fact, with their big scale, these firms set up subsidiaries in many different countries to be more convenient for the distribution of goods and services, which forms chains of supply cross-border as well as a close relationship among the states in the commercial field. Additionally, consumers can enjoy a diverse range of products and services at comparative prices. Multinational companies often produce a lot of various items to meet the needs of consumers for every market segment from usual to luxury levels. Therefore, this helps customers have more choices to fit their budget, which small businesses are hard to implement due to capital issues.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that the disadvantages of the growth of global companies are greater than the above advantages. To begin with, the loss in small businesses may create a disturbance to a large company's supply chain. In addition to building more branches, most large corporations tend to cooperate with smaller firms to offer their products approaching closer to consumers, including minority areas. Hence, if these companies fail, the distribution can be delayed and influences significantly to international businesses' performance. A part from this advantage, the disappearance of small companies can lead to the unemployment rate crisis. It can be seen that under the serious impact of the covid-19 pandemic in the past two years, a lot of workers have fallen into unemployment. One of the major reasons for this situation is that the number of small-scale enterprises has been bankrupted as facing the pandemic's pressure.
In conclusion, while some benefits can be noticed when large global businesses are replacing smaller companies, I argue that negative aspects still prevail.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | Lê Quỳnh Mai | 92 | view |
| 2021-05-11 | husan shergill | 89 | view |
| 2020-12-30 | Mandeep khokhar | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-27 | Jango Jo | 87 | view |
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas while others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own styles Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 75
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ale, these firms set up subsidiaries in many different countries to be more convenient for the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'businesses'' or 'business's'?
Suggestion: businesses'; business's
...fluences significantly to international businesses performance. A part from this advantage...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1937.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39554317549 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12344094457 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571030640669 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.775107296 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0625 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337956813861 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987113485699 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637244029504 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202099332361 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618086422489 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.