People can eat a wide variety of food that can be grown in other areas. As a result, people eat more food produced in other regions than local food. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
No wonder that technological advances in transportation have made it easier for food commodities to travel around the globe. However, such blooming trend in trading nourishments are probably responsible for the drop in local food consumption because people tend to have more preference for the exotic one. This essay will illustrate both stands of the phenomenon before the ultimate conclusion is reached.
To begin with, it is obvious that amenities to transport help food miles shorten than ever before, which benefits local consumers greatly from various food and victual choices. To illustrate, people living in cold climate countries where land do not favor growing all sorts of fruits and vegetables throughout the year can try tropical fruits and delicatessen from other regions.
Moreover, as multi-national giants coming raises higher competitiveness with local food producers, to be served on the dining table, local products must be leveled up tasty, ingredients, packaging and many other qualities and lowered their prices. Accordingly, such globalized food trend has resulted in people having the ability to enjoy foods to that they did not previously have access at really reasonable prices.
However, there are some downsides to the trend that should be taken into consideration. As mentioned above, international food companies with their advanced manufacturing technologies and clever advertising strategies make them far more efficient than local ones. As a result, the lack of competitiveness is synonymous with potential closure to local producers, vanishing local traditional products, and impairing cultural cuisine in the long run. In addition, imported food is not likely to be fresh and safe to our health given that preservatives and other harmful substances are commonly used in food processing to transport in a long distance between areas or countries.
In conclusion, it is apparent that the food produced in other regions is gaining popularity albeit several minuses concerning its fresh and local cuisine impact. However, I strongly believe that this is a positive trend due to the diversified diet and domestic food quality enhancement.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, moreover, really, so, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55421686747 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01642453155 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64156626506 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.07521656 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.846153846 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5384615385 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367704400463 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114606325132 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484485374572 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193607050756 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289138513168 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.