People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world?

Essay topics:

People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world?

It has been the norm that common understanding of the significance as well as existing issues of our environment has severely eroded. In this essay, technology will be highlighted as a major culprit for this erosion and solutions which will incorporate multilateral efforts will be presented.

The main villain between an increasingly weakened comprehension of the environment is young people's overindulgence in technological advancement. So alluring are these marvellous breakthroughs, the prime illustration of which is such social networks as Facebook or Instagram, that there is an overwhelming tendency for the young population to dedicate their most significant proportion of time to cyberspace socialisation. This is evidenced by numerous studies on leisure time which identify social networking as the biggest contributor to one's time allocation. This disproportionate distribution of time results in insufficient exposure to, and thus, an inadequate sense of appreciation for nature. This trend sheds light on why youngsters fail to come to a recognition of how crucial our mother nature is.

Prompt actions should be taken to tackle the seriousness of this trend. Firstly, on an individual basis, it is parents who should be held accountable as supervisors to control their young one's pastimes, as well as, directors to engage them in environment-promoting activities. In place of gaming or social networking, for instance, parents can take their young family members to nearby parks and educate them of nature. Secondly, there should be a collaborated effort between local authorities and schools in heightening students' awareness of the environment. For example, in Vietnam, there is an annual tree-planting contest on a nationwide scale for an improved appreciation of natural beauty.

In summary, in light of young people's tendency to partake in technology-related activities in their free time, thereby neglecting the environment, parents, schools and governments should join hands to enhance their awareness in this regard. Once these three parties collaborate, a bright future for all can be created

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 700, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...quate sense of appreciation for nature. This trend sheds light on why youngsters fai...
^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... authorities and schools in heightening students awareness of the environment. For examp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 594, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nment. For example, in Vietnam, there is an annual tree-planting contest on a nat...
^^
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...beauty. In summary, in light of young peoples tendency to partake in technology-relat...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in summary, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65517241379 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49321247379 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595611285266 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4720954588 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.857142857 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141193041193 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048378630311 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032531425115 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0844924929189 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159278633224 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.