These days, an increasing number of friends communicate with their friends or buy things online instead of in person. In my opinion, I believe it is convenient for individuals, however, it is a negative step as it can lead to problems later on in life.
The key reasons why people like to interact through the modern internet are many and varied. Firstly, it is convenient. People do not have to go anywhere to connect with friends both far and wide. By communicating this way saves time and effort, and also, it is an easy way to exchange innovative ideas, feelings and opinions. Another obvious reason is that it offers flexibility, for example, different applications such as Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp or Instagram can be downloaded on just one phone, and it is easy to navigate and reach out to friends on these platforms with the single gadget. Furthermore, people can purchase a diverse range of products and brands at competitive prices, and they can have their goods efficiently delivered to their doorstep.
On the other hand, I believe some challenges and social issues may arise when people rely too much on social media. First of all, they lose their social communication skills. This is because they spend more time on different media platforms, while spending less interacting in person. Hence, the conventional methods of communicating are lost. Another obvious issue is that texting frequently leads to misunderstandings and misinterpretations because as humans, we attach different meanings to things differently. Finally, when they depend on social media too much, they are unable to disconnect and find it challenging to complete a daily task.
In conclusion, although social networking platforms offer convenience and flexibility for communicating with friends, as well as cybershopping. I completely believe it can have negative impacts both individuals and society if this trend continues as face-to-face interaction will be lost.
- The internet has vastly increased our access to information To what extent do you think this is a good thing Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience You should spend about 40 minutes on this ta 84
- The charts show the proportion of male and female employees in different job categories in an engineering company in 2005 and in 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that they can make as much noise as they want while others think that the amount of noise people make should be strictly controlled 83
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause both social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree Give reason for your answer and inclu 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent media platforms, while spending less interacting in person. Hence, the conven...
^^
Line 5, column 622, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'completing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: completing
...e to disconnect and find it challenging to complete a daily task. In conclusion, althoug...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32797427653 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.123512456 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601286173633 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6517025695 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5625 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3125 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203316013623 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579731236845 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051130084459 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124776241436 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530065333883 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.