People nowadays send text messages more frequently than they talk on the phone. What are the reasons for this trend? Do the advantages of texting outweigh the disadvantages?
In this modern era, texting by instant message catches on in the society rather than direct communication including phone call. There are several reasons for this interesting topic and however, I consent to be more disadvantageous side which will be elaborated below.
To begin with, catching on the use of instant message rather than telephoning could benefit modern society from carefully noticing the texting purpose. During productive days, to deliver message will likely be chosen by most of working people. In relation to time limitation, this has them priotise increased workload - the high responsibility of multitasking and concentration. Furthermore, the proper-arranged sentences could be another reasonable one. The unpredictable situations of emotional feelings (nervousness and hesitation) probably distract the effectiveness of direct conversational characters including what the callers intend to convey. If people choose a texting way, they will have a chance to correct and ensure the proper sentences.
On the other hand, this issue might bring demerit which is inappropriate avenue to communicate with colleagues, especially top manager. The delayed reply might arouse the worse result of crucial determination that should be decided earlier, not to mention the unacceptable behaviour of communicating. In addition, a binding relationship could be stronger in the way of telephoning that forms intimate and deep conversation, especially for a spouse. Tone and stress voice, which could generate certain feeling or emotion regarding its content, are only provided in two-way communication (being on call).
To sum up, the tendency of operating short message rather than phoning would be induced by the objective of contextual information and the accuracy of selecting words. Meanwhile, I argue that unacceptable phone etiquette and lower couple relationship seems to be its demerits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-09 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-13 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | Andi Irwan Nur | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | Andi Irwan Nur | 70 | view |
- Nowadays both men and women spend much money on beauty care This was not so in the past What may be the root cause of this behaviour Discuss the reasons and possible results 89
- The number of children that read books for fun has dropped dramatically in recent years What are the reasons for this How can we encourage children to read more 85
- In today s competitive world many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income others feel they lack support because of their parents absence Discuss both th
- In many countries people like to eat more food from other regions than can be grown in a local area As a result much of the food has to come from other regions Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Over the last few decades the media has promoted the image of young thin women as being ideal What problems has this caused What solutions can you suggest for this issue 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'feelings'' or 'feeling's'?
Suggestion: feelings'; feeling's
...e unpredictable situations of emotional feelings nervousness and hesitation probably dis...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, while, in addition, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76241134752 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23052466757 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2128963404 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.071428571 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194212299929 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626909156134 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581582120586 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126225168353 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837312141911 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.