People should look after their health as a duty to the society where they live, rather than for their own benefits. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary settings, there exist divergent opinions regarding the reason for staying healthy. Among those, a noticeable assessment is that people ought to take care of their health in order to serve the community instead of their personal requirements. While I am in accord with the duty of contributing to society, I also believe that people’s own merits deserve to be taken into consideration.
On the one hand, it is irrefutable that people have to be healthy to fulfill their obligation with society. Since they were born, the majority of citizens have had their basic demand fully met, ranging from residential area, wearing to food and drink thanks to tranquil community. In order to protect and further develop their society, citizens assume an essential part of consistently working and contributing, which initially demands good health conditions. Obviously, without proper ability to be active in the workforce, individuals may be instead become burdens of the whole system. As a result, society may only flourish when most citizens are constantly aware of their well-being.
On the other hand, keeping fit is of paramount importance to individuals themselves as well. This is due to the need to release the meaningful moments to their own life. Being physically and mentally healthy allows for a multitude of experiences, be it traveling abroad or passionately pursuing their dreams. To illustrate, it is hard for ill people to express happiness on a daily basis, as they are fraught with worries and unable to devote themselves to other activities. In other words, should people desire to truly comprehend the significance of their life, they at first need to be in a good health state.
In summary, I opine that looking after people’s well-being is a favorable activity to cater to both society and their own lives. Therefore, if citizens can marry these two goals, it is highly likely that they not only develop themselves but also contribute to the sustainable betterment of the community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | RkmsU | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects like philosophy and history and only offer practical degree courses that maximise chances of employment To wh 84
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The table below gives information about student enrolments at Bristol University in 1928 1958 and 2008 84
- In some countries online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- In many parts of the world some famous people are considered role models and they are having an increasing influence on the young Is this a positive or negative development 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in summary, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21165644172 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92425904773 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.783573675 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.266666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26116475976 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861527206185 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603977463242 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162308463824 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199085125078 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, in summary, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21165644172 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92425904773 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.783573675 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.266666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26116475976 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861527206185 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603977463242 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162308463824 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199085125078 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.