People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your own opinion
It is generally believed that it is necessary for the government to alleviate environmental problems by raising petrol prices. While this is an effective solution, I would argue that other measures might have an even greater impact.
If national authorities raised taxes on petrol, it could help address some environmental issues. Firstly, cars’ owner would take into consideration about the number and length of their journey in order not to pay extra charge. Secondly, more goods would be delivered by rail or airway rather than truck. These two methods would help to cut down on carbon emission and reduce the greenhouse effect. However, it could only help to reduce a small amount of gasses released from vehicles since people still cannot cut down the demand for fuel at once/ rely heavily on fuel.
On the other hand, there are some effective measures could be taken to mitigate the dependence on fuel. By taking advantages of alternative energy sources such as solar power or nuclear power in producing energy, we would lower the reliance on fuel. Besides, a congestion charge in rush hours could be taken into consideration to ease the traffic flow. Additionally, the most practical and economic method at the moment is to encourage the use of public transport such as buses or commuter trains as well as offer bus and train passes since it help reduce large volumes of harmful emission.
In conclusion, a sharp rise in petrol prices might be an environmentally friendly solution. However, in the long term, other measures would be more effective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-13 | thanhtran1406 | 73 | view |
- Having children later in life 78
- 14 Cars damage the environment and their use is increasing Why How can this be controlled 78
- People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature such as novels and poems Do you agree or disagree 67
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 56
- environment 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: ECONOMIC_ECONOMICAL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economical' (=affordable, cheap)?
Suggestion: economical
...w. Additionally, the most practical and economic method at the moment is to encourage th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08139534884 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68559903205 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639534883721 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7502324592 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.846153846 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127943197992 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446961783031 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500093912821 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792351451457 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340591525503 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.