People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve
environmental problems. Give your opinion.
The industrialization of society has lead to the drastical increase of transportation devices, especially personal vehicles like cars, motorbikes and other massive vehicles like trucks, trains,..etc. Most of these vehicle use fossil fuel like diesel, coal, which emits carbon dioxide - a contamination for the environment. Some people argue that the price for fuel should be increased to reduce and eliminate pollution. In my perspective, I am not agree with this resolution, for the following reasons.
First and foremost, fuel plays a pivotal role in the seamless flow of production. If the price of fuel increase drastically, it may hinder car users to switch from their personal transportation to public ones. However, it would also affect other industries that also rely on fuel to operate like electricity, heating, manufactoring,..etc. Therefore, the tradeoff is not optimal to implement this solution.
Furthermore, there are better solution to to resolve environmental issue. For example, vehicles that utilize green power like biogas or electricity would display a more significant effect on eliminating potential threats from original power source like toxic waste, carbon emission. In order to develop and finalise these solution, optimal fuel cost is crucial. Even though it might have a bad influence on the environment in the short term, it will redeem itself and pay off well in the long run.
In conclusion, increasing the price of fuel is not a definitive solution to environmental pollution. Instead, focusing on sustainable energy source proven to be more reliable in the long-term.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 67
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows a survey result of 4000 participants who expressed what important aspects they have learned from the internship they have completed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...her massive vehicles like trucks, trains,..etc. Most of these vehicle use fossil f...
^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...er massive vehicles like trucks, trains,..etc. Most of these vehicle use fossil fu...
^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this vehicle' or 'these vehicles'?
Suggestion: this vehicle; these vehicles
...cles like trucks, trains,..etc. Most of these vehicle use fossil fuel like diesel, coal, whic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 449, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
... pollution. In my perspective, I am not agree with this resolution, for the following...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...like electricity, heating, manufactoring,..etc. Therefore, the tradeoff is not opt...
^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ike electricity, heating, manufactoring,..etc. Therefore, the tradeoff is not opti...
^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
... Furthermore, there are better solution to to resolve environmental issue. For exampl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this solution' or 'these solutions'?
Suggestion: this solution; these solutions
...ssion. In order to develop and finalise these solution, optimal fuel cost is crucial. Even tho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53036437247 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23876429719 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643724696356 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5666344376 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240614319959 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755953371623 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612620170081 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133844713476 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638845978166 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...her massive vehicles like trucks, trains,..etc. Most of these vehicle use fossil f...
^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...er massive vehicles like trucks, trains,..etc. Most of these vehicle use fossil fu...
^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this vehicle' or 'these vehicles'?
Suggestion: this vehicle; these vehicles
...cles like trucks, trains,..etc. Most of these vehicle use fossil fuel like diesel, coal, whic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 449, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
... pollution. In my perspective, I am not agree with this resolution, for the following...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...like electricity, heating, manufactoring,..etc. Therefore, the tradeoff is not opt...
^^
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ike electricity, heating, manufactoring,..etc. Therefore, the tradeoff is not opti...
^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
... Furthermore, there are better solution to to resolve environmental issue. For exampl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this solution' or 'these solutions'?
Suggestion: this solution; these solutions
...ssion. In order to develop and finalise these solution, optimal fuel cost is crucial. Even tho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53036437247 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23876429719 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643724696356 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5666344376 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240614319959 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755953371623 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612620170081 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133844713476 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638845978166 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.