Today single-use products are still very common. What are the problems associated with this? What are some possible solutions?
Nowadays, it is still apparent that single-use items are popular in the global market. Using these type of products are sometimes costly and most of the time have negative effects on the environment such as waste production. However, there are actions that could mitigate the negative effects, which will be furthered discussed in this essay.
To begin with, the consumption of one-time use products brings more costs and it has a negative effect on the environment. In other words, multi-use items are cost-effective while single-use item after purchase ends up on streets and subsequently pollute major water sources, rivers, and streams. Even when disposed of properly, they take many years to decompose thus generating vast amounts of garbage over long periods of time. For instance, disposable bottled water or other beverages after consumption adds to the world’s plastic pollution problem. This scenario is common in metropolitan areas because of the number of people and the increased marketing tricks of bottled products. Moreover, the cost spent on these single-use commodities is greater over time than the cost purchased for more sustainable or reusable things. For example, some buyers are not aware that spending money on buying plastic bottled water when in fact they could save by drinking in refillable containers.
Undoubtedly, this issue regarding cost and wastage of single-use items could be solved or mitigated. First, companies, manufacturers, and the government could implement a program or laws where products could be reused or recycled. One example is when the country Peru released a decree that single-use plastics should be replaced with reusable, biodegradable plastic or others whose degradation does not generate contamination to the ecological system. Second is recycling these single-use items to another useful product. Recycling is encouraged in items such as water bottles so that they will not be left to decompose in a long period of time and accumulate in our surroundings. Plastic bottles could be used as plant pots or they are sometimes collected by manufacturing companies in the production of other materials. Consequently, people will get used to adhering to these environmentally friendly activities with constant promotion and encouragement from authorities.
All in all, it will be difficult to totally eradicate the use of single-use products but there are ways to lessen the waste pollution and with public awareness, people will be encouraged to reuse and recycle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of garbage over long periods of time. For instance, disposable bottled water o...
^^
Line 5, column 632, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...will not be left to decompose in a long period of time and accumulate in our surroundings. Pla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46803069054 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98770491331 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4360169795 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7222222222 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189284652884 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692501887565 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454454502915 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12696897135 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00946323611166 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.