A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
According to psychologists, one of the most important desires of humans is to feel important. Traditionally, virtues like honesty and geniality defined a person’s social worth; however, nowadays these values are replaced by money. This essay largely agrees that old fashioned characteristics are still relevant in the twenty-first century despite some exceptions.
In impoverished nations, having a significant amount of money can elevate one’s social worth. This is because in such countries an affluent person has the means to influence political as well as administrative leaders and being able to manipulate these authorities increases their worth. For instance, in countries such as Paraguay or South Sudan rich people are often revered by public due to their wealth. As a consequence, places where poverty is major issue money can increase a person’s social status.
On the other hand, old fashioned values are still considered important. Anyone can earn a lavish amount of money by doing illegal acts such as burglary or drug smuggling but respect in society can only be earned by performing philanthropic work. For example, Bill Gates and Warren buffet are two of the richest men of the century, but they are highly admired and revered not for their wealth accumulation but for their charity work and are put forward than other billionaires. Therefore, traditional values impacts one’s social worth even today.
To conclude, although a person may have influence in the society due to its huge materialistic possessions, kindness, honesty and thoughtfulness towards others define a person’s real status.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | Leauren | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | Nweze christabel | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | Nweze christabel | 67 | view |
- It is inevitable that as technology advances, traditional cultures will be lost. It seems that we cannot have these two things together. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- There is an increasing trend of old people living longer in many countries around the world Do you think this has a positive or a negative effect on the population as a whole 78
- Some people think that radio is the best way to get news while others think that television is better for this purpose.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Some people feel that we are wasting our money in the Space Race. We need to spend money on earth. Do you agree or disagree with this?” 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs define a person's real status.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56972111554 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12600010187 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645418326693 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8588981248 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210308397098 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779263152435 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351286197895 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126178904363 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337642124561 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.