The pie chart
The pie chart shows four reasons why farmland significantly decreased in the world today. In general, deforestation and over- gzazing hold 65% in whole. Over- cultivation stood 28%. And the other reasons account for only 7%.
And the four reasons affected three countries of the world during the 1990s, namely, North America, Europe and Oceania. With deforestation, Europe stood at 9.8% whereas the impact of North America and Oceania was minimal with 0.2% and 1.7% respectively. Move on to over- cultivation, Europe continued to lead to 7.7%. By constract, Oceania hit a low with 0% and North America with 3.3%. Oceania, total land degraded with 13% and suffered from 11.3% of over- grazing- the highest percentage of 3 countries. While the others suffered 1.5% and 5.5% respectively. Moreover, total land degraded of Europe hit a high with 23%, so they bore the biggest damage. However, North America suffered the lowest losses with 5% in 3 regions.
Conclusion, it is precise that Europe stood more farmland than the other countries in the world. And that loss came from deforestation and over-cultivation .
- Punishments for each type of crime should be fixed carefully Besides that there are many opinions supprorting this idea and also against fixed punishments
- the free pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the course 56
- teach children 56
- the table gives information about consumer spending in 5 countries in 2002 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The pie chart shows four reasons why farmland signific...
^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... from deforestation and over-cultivation .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 1615.20841683 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 180.0 315.596192385 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21111111111 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83045527453 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 176.041082164 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605555555556 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 506.74238477 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7283620505 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.0 106.682146367 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.8571428571 20.7667163134 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0585834210744 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0227141186904 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818969196153 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612241374739 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865840055602 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 50.2224549098 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.3001002004 60% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.05 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.