Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high-tech media such as software, videos or Dvds. Do you agree or disagree?
There is no room to doubt that the public libraries playing a crucial role in shaping the domestic communities, on the other hand there is a massive technological transformation happen in the world current days, for that some public libraries started to invest and spend part of their budgets regard to catching all this new high-tech devices such as (augmented reality, videos, DVDs and etc.…), majority of people are supporting this transformation inside this authorities, but other NOT.
Conservation people who still prefer traditional way of learning and reading from a hardware materials and tangible materials like books, they looking to see the public library’s shelves full of books when they ever pay a visit to it, the reason why this people want that is based on the stereotype that say “the only friends of learning are books ”, whether they believe in it or not, beside there is thousands of books on the shelves full of dust and hardly touchable by visitors, however, there ignoration for the benefits of digital materials coexist with their classical thoughts.
Despite the dominance of books on the last century and earlier time in ongoing century, the impacts of new digital methods are undeniably and proving their efficiency day after day, imagine who many of books can be storage of just two-inch DVD and we could remove it from public libraries’ shelves to safe more space for interacting, moreover the recent generation are captivated by this high-technologies because it’s rooted on interaction and grabbing intention instead of keep freezing on your disc for hours.
In one word we couldn’t say the age of preserved way of reading is done, no, each side has its own pros and cons either the classical or modern way of reading and learning inside the public libraries. Therefore, depends on all the facts we mention, I see from my own perspective we have to support the blending mood of learning at the public libraries to meet the need of both types of people.
- Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish Others however argue that it has only made people busier 84
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagram details the process of making leather products 84
- The charts show average levels of participation and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 78
- The diagram details the process of making leather products 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...such as augmented reality, videos, DVDs and etc.…, majority of people are supporting thi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 456, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e supporting this transformation inside this authorities, but other NOT. Conserva...
^^^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... ever pay a visit to it, the reason why this people want that is based on the stereo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[3]
Message: Did you mean 'there are thousands'?
Suggestion: there are thousands
...ether they believe in it or not, beside there is thousands of books on the shelves full of dust an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00898203593 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76892372194 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595808383234 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 16.0721442886 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 66.0 20.2975951904 325% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 167.514775468 49.4020404114 339% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 334.6 106.682146367 314% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 66.8 20.7667163134 322% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 15.6 7.06120827912 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148118972453 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733600355411 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402650066137 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860262602324 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346626689778 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 35.6 13.0946893788 272% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 12.95 50.2224549098 26% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 27.9 11.3001002004 247% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.96 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.5 9.78957915832 301% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 28.4 10.1190380762 281% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.