In recent years, the structure of a family and the role of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive and negative?
Recently, the world has witnessed some gradual changes in the family pattern and the role of its members, especially the parents. From my point of view, these shifts can yield tangible benefits, thus can be considered as positive trends.
Some significant changes can be observed in families today. The first one is the decreased size of families in many countries. People nowadays have the tendency to live in nuclear families with only parents and children rather than in extended ones. Another shift is the change in the roles of parents in a family. In the past, a household used to rely solely on one breadwinner, who was often the father. However, these days, both parents can pursue their own careers, thus having the same role in a family. Accordingly, the financial responsibility and household duties are shared equally by the two partners.
I would reckon that these changes can be seen as positive developments in modern society. The prevalence of nuclear families can yield tangible benefits as it can not only allow people to have more freedom and privacy in their family but also give parents more chances to care for their children properly. Similarly, the change in the roles of parents can also be recognised as beneficial because partners can share the responsibilities and burdens, thus leading to a happier family. As both parents have equal working opportunities, men can be freed from the pressure of being the only financial support while women can enjoy financial freedom. Moreover, this trend could help ensure the financial stability of the family.
In conclusion, I would contend that the trend towards shifting to smaller family sizes and sharing equal responsibilities between two parents in the present households can be seen as a positive development due to the advantages they yield.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-11 | tr_h.20 | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | Dangdang | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-07 | kimtaeyeons | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | sroye Mandeep | 84 | view |
| 2020-12-18 | laraenn | 56 | view |
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money Governments must invest the money in public services instead To that extent do you agree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 67
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 84
- The bar chart below shows the number of visitors to four London museums Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- To meet the growing needs of food for the increasing population country should make use of edible insects as foods However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but also affect negatively the nature too What are the benefits and drawback 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, thus, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13422818792 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78281612447 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546979865772 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.229649215 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234894657042 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960666673081 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833272984951 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162856942488 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679414763969 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.