In recent years, the structure of a family and the roles of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
The issue of family dynamics gradually changing is one that has been discussed increasingly over the past few years. At this point, some claim that these changes have positives, while others claim they have negatives. This essay will now examine both the positives and negatives of the changes occurring in family dynamics.
First, the reason of this phenomenon is due to rapid change in our society. So, this phenomenon might be able to change financial obligations and roles in families. When there is an increase in family members, they need much more money. So the parents will both get jobs not only the father but also the mother. Therefore they can divide the economic problem and the children will grow up independently. Next, when they age, they will switch the financial obligations from the parents to the sons and daughters. Then the children can take care of the family, when they parents age.
However, we should not overlook drawbacks as well. In fact, as mentioned above, separating the economic problem has in positives and negatives. They both work the children won’t be taken care of by the parents. So, the children will be taken to day care or the grandparents when the parents are working. As a result, they will haven’t touched from their parents during grow up. Then they will depend on the others, finally their children might not be able to felt about the love of family. As a result, they wouldn’t spend time with the parents while growing up on others. Finally, the children might not to be able to feel the love of family.
To conclude, there are both positives and negatives of this trend. However, my personal perspective is more close to the negatives.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- In recent years, the structure of a family and the roles of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 11
- In recent years, the structure of a family and the roles of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 56
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages? 61
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do Advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ot only the father but also the mother. Therefore they can divide the economic problem an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'parent'
Suggestion: parent
... can take care of the family, when they parents age. However, we should not overl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, look, so, then, therefore, well, while, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9446366782 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56558469548 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512110726644 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.3731833583 49.4020404114 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.45 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.45 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130717488883 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447974802889 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624057659918 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101456329052 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916050361753 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.