Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Rich nations frequently help other ones, especially some poorer countries, by giving some financial aids. However, these aids do not solve the poverty situation in undeveloped localities. Therefore, I completely believe that some developed countries should help undeveloped ones not only by some essential finance aids but also some other types of help, such as health and education.
Some financial aids are influential for undeveloped countries to solve their economic problems and improve their infrastructural system. After governments of the undeveloped countries receive these aids, they will have some excellent choices to develop their countries. In Africa, there are plenty of undeveloped countries that are needed helps from other countries, especially wealthy countries, such as U.S.A, Russia, China, and Japan. Due to some help from these countries, the infrastructural systems of some poor localities are repaired and improved. However, some financial aids cannot completely delete the poverty situation of these undeveloped nations.
Therefore, some rich nations should support some poorer nations by other types of help, such as healthy and educational supports. For instance, if a country receives educational supports from developed countries, that country will have more advanced workers and scientists. Hence, it is easy to clarify that the country will be an excellent place to attract some famous branding companies, and more essential job opportunities will be created for local people. Moreover, if the country receives health supports from developed countries and has some job opportunities from some large companies, people can apply to these companies to earn money to live their family and improve their country.
To sum up, rich nations should give not only some finance aids but also some other types, like health and education, to undeveloped countries, which will help these countries more completely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- Even though doctors advise old people to get more exercise many old people do not get enough What are the reasons for this What are some possible solutions for this 84
- The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences What extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The tradition of families getting together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 73
- The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences What extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 409, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...pecially wealthy countries, such as U.S.A, Russia, China, and Japan. Due to some ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68275862069 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83543905338 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48275862069 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.61844152 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.769230769 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28340979371 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1299023381 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484685481634 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213414874965 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030762896234 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.