Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Financial aid is not a long-term method of solving the porverty issue in poor countries. For those countries that urge to solve this issue fundamentally, other sustainble types of help given by the developed countries will be more effcient and practical in this case.
Firstly, cultural and governmental assistance is vital. Consultation in government policy-making, management and governance will improve the political environment and elevating the government management skills. The purpose of this intention is to drive the public independent conciousness and increase the participation in social activities. In this case, the ultimate goal is to faciliate the politcal revoluation and development.
Solving the livelihood issue is also another effective way of helping poor developing countries. On the one hand, employement has been a forefront topic for long time. Inadequate jobs and opportunities in poor countries has led to slow development in economy and poor standard of living condition. Increasing in foreign investment will tackle this issue by creating more jobs, which increase the employment rate and improve the productivity in the great extent. On the other hand, improving medical, educational facilities and infrastructure will bring larger social benefit to the poor countries. In this case. the better living standard will undoubtedly impel the stability and development of the countries.
Taking the Belt and Road initiative as an example. The related countries have gained enormous benefits from the initiative. Developing countries are bond together by beneficial polices. The closer the relationship between countries, the greater positive effects that will bring to the world enconomy and the human beings.
In general, aid in financal is important in some extent but it is not sustainable enough in the long run. Solving the poverty issue is never an simple action. The strategy shall be considered and made by both rich countries and poor developing countries from political, economic, cultural, social and ecological aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 73
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development Discuss both views and give your opinio 73
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on society 84
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagram below shows how rain water is collected and then treated to be used as drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'solving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: solving
...ountries. For those countries that urge to solve this issue fundamentally, other sustain...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 613, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...it to the poor countries. In this case. the better living standard will undoubtedly...
^^^
Line 9, column 142, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...run. Solving the poverty issue is never an simple action. The strategy shall be co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, so, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67419354839 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10921727288 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567741935484 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0139466533 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.95 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249648049356 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688545655948 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813073525751 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152739444281 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939650508311 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.