Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The financial support of wealthy nations towards impoverished counterparts has become more prevalent than ever. Nevertheless, it universally believes that this allowance is unable to tackle poverty and, thereby, giving other means of supporting can be much more advantageous. From my perspective, while it is irrefutable that the diversity in types of help is essential for underdeveloped countries, the benefits of financial aid should not be underestimated
On the one hand, there is a variety of aid that necessary for the comprehensive and sustainable development of one nation. One outstanding support is technology transfer. By sharing the technological advancement, the developed countries can help poorer society to miraculously strengthen their economy and overcome poverty. The presentation of automation machinery system, which can completely transform an industry due to the significant boost in productivity, can be an appropriate case in point. Another salvation which is worth considering is the collaboration in the medical field. There seems no shadow of a doubt that medicines, as well as other therapeutically agents, make a great contribution to the prosperity of a nation since health is the most precious asset of humans. Consequently, well-being countries are more likely to free from poverty when compared to debilitated ones
Nonetheless, there is also a variety of beneficial impacts that financial supports bring to a nation. First and foremost, it is helpful to surmount emergencies, especially social catastrophes such as prolonged drought, earthquake or tsunami. In these alarming circumstance, the national budget may insufficient and foreign supports play a pivotal role in recovering after the disaster. Furthermore, the monetary aid is allegedly attributed to the governmental fundings, thereby, allowing the authority to invest in more colossal economic projects for the lucrative purpose. Evidently, the financial stability offers undernourished nations an enormous opportunity to whittle down the poverty rates
In conclusion, while other types of aid including the transference in technology and medical treatment is important, the merits of financial supports from rich countries are still beneficial for a nation to overcome poverty
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- some say that because many people are living much longer the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries Do you agree or disagree 84
- People think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others believe that there are other alternative solutions for reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion on this topic 84
- Nowadays there is an increase in social problems involving young people because more parents spent time at work than with their children To what extent do you agree or disagree Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human s life 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, then, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83233532934 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4171790764 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601796407186 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.9287747231 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.846153846 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189048053728 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566543880254 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615328950418 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122765689488 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543837764667 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.