Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, a great number of affluent nations create financial-aid packages to support countries enduring from poverty ; however, this method seems to be ineffective. Although I opine that money help could be considered to be one of the most feasible ways, I am persuaded to think that other types of help might be more effective for poorer nations.
On the one hand, there are a chain of arguments encouraging me to believe that rich countries ought to help impoverished ones financially. The first justification is that if prosperous nations allocate money to help poorer ones, these countries can use money supported to provide their inhabitants with food, water. For example, thanks to the money aid from other rich countries, innumerable residents living in some impoverished nations in Africa like Nigeria, Sudan,… do not suffer from famines. Without money support, a lot of lives could not be saved. Furthermore, owning to the financial allocation from many affluent countries, plenty of poor ones can make investments to boost their own economies. As a result, these nations can see the prospects and opportunities to be capable of escaping from the poverty and developing to gain prosperity.
On the other hand, from my perspective, other types of assistance can be attributed to be the motivation for poor nations to progress. The most fundamental help might be the supplies of food and fresh water. As these things can be considered to be the most paramount factors for the survival of humans, a great number of citizens do not no longer endure from hungers. To illustrate, if it had not been for the food support from other wealthy countries like the USA or the UK, a lot of Africans could have lost their lives due to starvation. Moreover, it might be efficient for rich nations to exchange modern technical technology with poorer ones to help their economies and other fields. Thanks to the advanced technology, impoverished nations can apply it to fundamental economic sectors and gradually recover from the crisis they have to confront.
In conclusion, apparently, financial support for poorer nations from the prosperous ones might bring about a number of benefits. Besides, I would assert that it might be more auspicious for other kinds of help to be taken into account.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | viet@2002 | 95 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | quan12341234 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | ngandaqueen | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | ngandaqueen | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | cinderel | 61 | view |
- 1 Technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialised facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poorer countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of workers from five different European countries that were absent for a day or more due to illness from 1991 to 2001 Summarise the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'chains'?
Suggestion: chains
... nations. On the one hand, there are a chain of arguments encouraging me to believe ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 467, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...ed nations in Africa like Nigeria, Sudan,… do not suffer from famines. Without mon...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10904255319 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87963990553 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497340425532 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6002106735 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0625 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174562350221 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679377952588 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486320228223 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127666399535 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474962316142 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.