Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Whether scientific research ought to be carried out and reined in by the government instead of private companies has always been found at the center of discussion. While some people hold positive attitude, saying that it is not fair to deny the freedom to allow private companies to carry out scientific research, I still think scientific research should be controlled by government.
Firstly, scientific research conducted by the government rather than private companies ensures it is in tune with moral standards and does not risk hurting well-being of whole human society. More often than not the results yielded by scientific research would make great impact on every aspect of people’s lives. This saying got powerful backings, evidence A is microchips. With the advancement of microchips, some computer-related industries gain momentum, benefiting human society. In contrast, some outcome of research might be a curse to human, nuclear booms being one of the examples. Since there is no sure thing about what impact that scientific research will have on our society, it should be the government which would take its citizen’s safety and happiness over other things to tame all the scientific research. However, private companies might not hold such social responsibilities as their priority and their scientific fruit might lead human being into unintended territory. For instance, a gene expert in China from a private company knocked off AIDS genes passed by their parents for two baby girls, which is not allowed by international rules related to gene experiment. This event stirred a wide range of reviews internationally since what he did provoked a great concern among society.
Secondly, it is the government instead of private companies that would secure financial support to conduct scientific research, the result of which might pave way to a better life for people. Government, to most extent, gain more confidence and trust than private companies. Moreover, government boast the talent pool where those genius would weave their magics to work out great scientific fruit. Such characteristics and merits of a government allow it to get ventures from investors. With the financial support, scientific research would be conducted smoothly. However, the other side of the picture is quite opposite, private companies would never compete with government about attracting the talents and high level of reliability. Therefore, their experiments might end up with being a pipe dream.
In conclusion, it is government which should take scientific research in charge rather than private enterprises. Government would closely supervise the scientific projects, making sure they would not jeopardize the public and it would have more ventures to run those projects, which, to some extent, will yield more scientific fruits to benefit society as a whole.
- Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that older school children should learn a wide range of subjects and develop knowledge Others however think that they should only learn a small number of subjects in detail Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Many people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 73
- Many children find it difficult to concentrate on or pay attention to their studies at school What are the causes What are the possible solutions to this problem 56
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...panies to carry out scientific research, I still think scientific research should...
^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this genius' or 'those genii', 'those geniuses'?
Suggestion: this genius; those genii; those geniuses
... government boast the talent pool where those genius would weave their magics to work out gr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2427.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 446.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44170403587 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87725825984 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531390134529 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.9 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6779498571 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.35 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395485192376 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126069327248 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981099752554 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271456781296 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750621923906 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...panies to carry out scientific research, I still think scientific research should...
^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this genius' or 'those genii', 'those geniuses'?
Suggestion: this genius; those genii; those geniuses
... government boast the talent pool where those genius would weave their magics to work out gr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2427.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 446.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44170403587 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87725825984 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531390134529 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.9 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6779498571 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.35 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395485192376 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126069327248 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981099752554 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271456781296 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750621923906 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.