SMALL COMPANIES SHOULD AVOID RECRUITING YOUNG WOMAN WHO DO NOT HAVE THEIR OWN FAMILY IN ORDER TO AVOID PAYING MATERNITY LEAVE LATER ON.
Whether or not businesses should hire unmarried woman has been receiving endless public view. Although many think that companies can avoid maternity leave payment if they do not hire young females, i partly agree with such statement. However, there are still many benefits of recruiting young woman.
There is a reason why recruiting young woman can adversly affect some businesses. First, some companies, especially those which low budgets, may run out of business if spending too much on maternity leave. This means, with a high amount of payment having to pay on woman leaving their job because of giving birth, companies may lose lots of profit and that they do not have much money left to invest on other beneficial sectors. For example, Australian companies said that they had to spend about six to nine months salary for maternity leave and claimed that it is hard to maintain their budget.
On the other hand, there are several factors why young females can bring benefits to the companies. First, it cannot be denied that woman who do not have their own family have more time to spend on their work. This means they can work for longer hours and can cope with a heavy workload because they are not responsible for taking care after their children. Secondly, being young, unmarried woman are more productive and that they can come up with new or unique ideas. For instance, Harvard business professor argued that they are likely to hire young woman because they can work efficiently and that more than half of their woman employees are unmarried.
To conclude, although recruiting young woman can create some potential downsides, I believe that there are some benefits that can be taken into consideration.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that you can never become fluently in a language unless you have spent time living or working in that country 82
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- While some people consider global warming to be the most pressing environmental problem which we have at the moment others believe that deforestation has a more devastating impact on our world Discuss both side and give your opinion 84
- SMALL COMPANIES SHOULD AVOID RECRUITING YOUNG WOMAN WHO DO NOT HAVE THEIR OWN FAMILY IN ORDER TO AVOID PAYING MATERNITY LEAVE LATER ON 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether or not businesses should hire unmarried...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not businesses should hire unmarried woman ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97222222222 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38856586963 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.933552623 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.153846154 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302157852852 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110635245981 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759952382356 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177794442232 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669746288444 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.