The society would be benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary society, it is generally believed that society would be benefit from from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no usefull purpose, and can even be damaging. Personally, I totally disagree with this statement.
For a variety of reason, it would be effective if people live in the society do not have advertising. First, adverstisement will have everybody know more products. That mean is all of products will be known by people. Second, deal with people who do not have enough time to research information of products, advertisement will have them easy choose through advertising. On the other hand, products of companies will be develop by advertised.
Apart from the abovementioned pratical concerns, it would be better if society do not have advertising. In the social nowadays, advertising explored more on the internet, but not at all advertising real exactly, in there will have types of products with more quality image. From that, people do not know which products are really good for them. After that, user may be waste of money to buy other products but it not like advertising and drop mood.
Taking everything into consideration, if live in the society have advertising will have better benefit for people than the society lack of advertising.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-12 | anhduonggnee.e | view | |
| 2023-08-18 | tdat2709 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | giaminhonha | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | trikhung777 | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
- The society would be benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 67
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: from
... believed that society would be benefit from from a ban on all forms of advertising becau...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f people live in the society do not have advertising. First, adverstisement will ...
^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ompanies will be develop by advertised. Apart from the abovementioned pratical c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, really, second, so, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 212.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10849056604 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94959962528 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 176.041082164 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551886792453 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6380689045 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.25 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339556536847 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131781959218 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140516296406 0.0667982634062 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240539939212 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165148218988 0.056905535591 290% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.