The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?
There is a notion that modern society would receive certain advantages as a result of prohibiting advertisement, which is claimed to be meaningless and even harmful. Personally, I totally disagree with this statement.
For a variety of reasons, the ban on advertising can even detrimentally affect society. To begin with, as global economy has advanced in leaps and bounds, the majority of products, tangible and non-tangible, are widely advertised on diverse platforms, such as social media. In other words, this development has generated heaps of employment opportunities for people, especially those who show interest in marketing and advertisement. Hence, this policy may take numerous jobs away from people in the community, prompting a surge of unemployment rate consequently. For instance, in Viet Name, a large number of individuals are currently employed in marketing and advertising industry. Therefore, an official ban on advertisement can cause labour lay-off on a large scale, leaving many unemployed people in the workforce.
Apart from the abovementioned practical concerns, advertisement has played an indispensible role in many societies. To explain, the sole purpose of advertising is to promote products or services of a company, contributing to the process of achieving the ultimate goal in most organisations, making profits. This means that, without conducting any advertising campaign under any platforms, a lot of company may have to struggle in order to acknowledge their customers. For example, the emergence of Tiktok, a popular social networking app, has facilitated loads of organisations, particularly small businesses, to spread information to the viewers on a larger regional scale. As a result, it would be unjustifiable to consider advertising useless.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that while society might be negatively affected through the prohibition of advertisement, the meaningful of advertising should also be emphasised.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-12 | anhduonggnee.e | view | |
| 2023-08-18 | tdat2709 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | giaminhonha | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | trikhung777 | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 89
- Some people think that only managers should make decisions in the company while others think that employees should also be involved in the process of decision making Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- In the future it is expected that the proportion of older people will be higher than that of young people in many developed countries What are the positive or negative effects of this development 11
- Being a celebrity such as famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits What are the problems of being famous Do you think being famous is good or bad 84
- There is no need for printed books magazines and newspapers To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nsequently. For instance, in Viet Name, a large number of individuals are currently employed in m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, may, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80067567568 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47090688097 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652027027027 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2130158563 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.642857143 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190276052051 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06449467265 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505831243291 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111385636686 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133770903992 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.