The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?
There is a notion that modern society would receive certain advantages as a result of prohibiting advertisement, which is claimed to be meaningless and even harmful. Personally, I totally disagree with this statement.
For a variety of reasons, the ban on advertising can even detrimentally affect society. To begin with, as global economy has advanced in leaps and bounds, the majority of products, tangible and non-tangible, are widely advertised on diverse platforms, such as social media. In other words, this development has generated heaps of employment opportunities for people, especially those who show interest in marketing and advertisement. Hence, this policy may take numerous jobs away from people in the community, prompting a surge of unemployment rate consequently. For instance, in Viet Name, a large number of individuals are currently employed in marketing and advertising industry. Therefore, an official ban on advertisement can cause labour lay-off on a large scale, leaving many unemployed people in the workforce.
Apart from the abovementioned practical concerns, advertisement has played an indispensible role in many societies. To explain, the sole purpose of advertising is to promote products or services of a company, contributing to the process of achieving the ultimate goal in most organisations, making profits. This means that, without conducting any advertising campaign under any platforms, a lot of company may have to struggle in order to acknowledge their customers. For example, the emergence of Tiktok, a popular social networking app, has facilitated loads of organisations, particularly small businesses, to spread information to the viewers on a larger regional scale. As a result, it would be unjustifiable to consider advertising useless.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that while society might be negatively affected through the prohibition of advertisement, the meaningful of advertising should also be emphasised.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-12 | anhduonggnee.e | view | |
| 2023-08-18 | tdat2709 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | giaminhonha | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | trikhung777 | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
- Schools should focus more on teaching students how to be successful in the workforce and less on helping them to achieve academic success To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In many countries people do not recycle waste materials such as paper glass and cans What are the reasons for this What could be done to solve this problem 73
- Some educationalists argue that non exam arts based subjects such as music drama art and craft should be compulsory in the secondary school curriculum They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance To what extent do yo 73
- It should be more expensive to make sugary products less appealing to consumers in order to encourage them to consume less Many manufactured foods and drinks contain high levels of sugar which can cause many health problems Do you agree or disagree 84
- In recent times economic growth has helped many become richer both in developed and developing countries However those in developed countries are not as happy as they were in the past Why is this What can be learned from this 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nsequently. For instance, in Viet Name, a large number of individuals are currently employed in m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, may, so, therefore, while, apart from, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80067567568 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47090688097 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652027027027 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2130158563 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.642857143 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190276052051 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06449467265 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505831243291 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111385636686 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133770903992 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.