Some believe that success in life comes from hard work and determination. Others think that it depends on factors such as money or personal appearance.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is often argued that resolution and working hard would be the keystone to success, whereas some others believed that looks and finances play a major role in victory. Both opinions have rights in this scenario I think the former has more power in today's world.
On the one hand, successful personals history exhibits their prominent thinking to reach their goals and the difficulties they overcome throughout their pathways lead them to the highest position. They often reject their small happiness, entertainment, and other gatherings to achieve their inner ambitions. For instance, the former president of India Dr. APJ Abdulkhalam comes from one of the poorest and illiterate families in India. His prestigious position is one of the best examples of perseverance. Intelligence and achievements would not get always with money or another backdoor.
On the other hand, the industrial world always leads with financial, political, and celebrity power. People often get jobs, positions, and other materialistic standards with blacks and dark hands. Likewise, the predominant influence of celebrities or good-looking people in society also plays a role to think in such a way to many. However, this kind of placement will not succeed in the long term. Any of the ways they would have some disparity and failures to some extent. For example, people who come after the support of bribery may have failures in their careers to the core. Secondly, looks may create some fans in films or serials, while in contrast, their career developed with their wonderful acting and selection of directors. No film stars are successful in their field only with beauty, their attitude, and the intellectual selection of characters may lead them to higher ranks.
To sum up, even though funds and looks have some roles in winners, the major aspects are intended to their will power and eager thinking to the target.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'personals'' or 'personal's'?
Suggestion: personals'; personal's
...s world. On the one hand, successful personals history exhibits their prominent thinki...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...always with money or another backdoor. On the other hand, the industrial world ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, look, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, i think, in contrast, kind of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19805194805 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7063105199 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.549914697 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0625 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15506362972 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480593680303 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399213007109 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104172283069 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595999723393 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.