Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones.
Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
It is a fact that children usually spend an excessive amount of time using their cell phones on a daily basis. There are various reasons behind this phenomenon and I personally think this has a negative impact on children.
To begin with, I assume that there are two main reasons why children waste too much time on their smartphones. The first reason is that smartphones can help them to entertain themselves via applications such as Facebook, Instagram, or YouTube. Due to the wide range of content on such applications, it is extremely easy for children to get addicted to them. Another reason is related to the responsibility of their parents. To be more specific, many parents allowed their off-springs to use cell phones at a very early age without any management. As a result, since the children are not aware of the deleterious effects of using smartphones, they would keep using them more and more.
I contend that the overuse of smartphones can lead to several detrimental effects. One of them is potential health problems, especially vision. In particular, since spending a long time staring at the screen can make children’s eyes tired and exhausted, they might be likely to suffer from short-sightedness or other eye problems in the future. Furthermore, children can also lose their relationships in real life. Despite the probability of them making friends on the Internet, all such connections are totally virtual and easy to be broken. When they go out into society, there would not many people want to be friends with a smartphone addict, which gradually makes them depressed and devastated.
In conclusion, there are a number of factors leading to the excessive
use of smartphones of children, including countless entertaining content and parents’ mismanagement. It seems to me that this trend is a negative development owing to the harmful influences it exerts on them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-17 | lethianhthu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-07 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-01-07 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-21 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mber of factors leading to the excessive use of smartphones of children, includin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12218649518 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03788930257 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594855305466 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4474631985 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5625 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198889011249 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665309180393 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684594329776 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121152025243 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932449224703 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.