Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones.
Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
It is widely believed that children are overusing their smartphones every day. This essay will point out the reasons for this problem and from my point of view, this is completely a negative development.
It is possible that this issue may be caused by a number of main factors. One of the prominent reasons concerning this problem is the indulgence and early permission to use this kind of smart device from the parents of the children. It is understandable and inevitable that these days, due to the requirement of the learning process, parents tend to allow their kids to get exposed early and quickly to digital products such as phones, and laptops so that their kids could be supported comprehensively. As a result, their teenagers have more chances to overuse these devices and to make their justifications if they receive any reminders. The second reason behind this could be the lack of supervision from the parental side. Nowadays, owning to the fact that parents have to deal with an enormous amount of workload not only at work but also at home as well as they tend to be occupied with their jobs so they often have no time left to supervise or take care of their teenagers. Furthermore, with the strong and global development of innovative technology, human lives are also influenced significantly by it. For example, children tend to use social media, and online games to be their relaxation and entertainment forms instead of going out there.
There are unquestionably a number of reasons why this is an adverse development for children. Firstly, the overuse of high-tech phones could give rise to the risk of getting mental health problems and illnesses. For instance, these are anxiety, depression, autism, and communication disorders. Following that, youngsters would experience a decline in their focus and efficiency in terms of study, social contact, and communication. Moreover, this could lead to a situation where teenagers depend excessively on smart devices when it comes to studying and examination. As a consequence, more seriously, their mindset and critical thinking skills could also be affected negatively.
In conclusion, there are primary factors contributing to the overuse of smartphones every day in children, including parental indulgence and the lack of control from the parental side. Despite certain benefits that smartphones can bring to teenager's lives, I am totally of the opinion that this is an adverse development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-17 | lethianhthu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-07 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-01-07 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-21 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 680, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ills could also be affected negatively. In conclusion, there are primary factors...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18045112782 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9852328011 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546365914787 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8532793287 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.833333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38888888889 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26489628455 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869058618832 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710206678436 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187593413794 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07056005257 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 680, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ills could also be affected negatively. In conclusion, there are primary factors...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18045112782 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9852328011 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546365914787 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8532793287 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.833333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38888888889 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26489628455 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869058618832 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710206678436 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187593413794 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07056005257 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.