Some children spend hours everyday on their smartphones.
Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
With the nonstop improvement of technology, mobile devices play a crucial role in our daily life. In other words, they now are undetachable tools for human in modern society. Consequently, most of the youngsters nowadays are spending a great deal of time on their own smartphones. Honestly speaking, I assume this is a really good development in the technology era so far.
As we all know, smartphones can offer to their young users different types of entertainment such as movies, online games, etc. It is very convenient for such people with busy schedules that they can hardly take their children anywhere outside of their houses or workplaces. Also, they encourage children a lot after a long day at school as well as stimulate the creativity of oneself when it comes to the virtual world they make for their own sake with mobile devices.
In addition, through the network and social media, children can increase their knowledge by reading articles on various topics and debating it online with many people out there without any distance restriction. For instance, a student who needs to research for his or her presentation can find a tremendous source of information on the internet. And if that pupil has something in mind and wants to exchange it immediately they may be able to find help from someone in the comment section of the topic. Moreover, different from heavy dictionaries or textbooks, smartphones are visibly way more convenient to carry around.
In conclusion, the daily usage of cell phones of youngsters brings more benefits than its negative impact as long as we learn how to balance our time for study and relaxation. That means if cell phones are used for good or educational purposes, it is a great thing we should accept as a fact, especially when we are now living in the age of 4.0.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-17 | lethianhthu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-07 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-01-07 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-21 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, honestly, if, may, moreover, really, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90938511327 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7890995797 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618122977346 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6332297373 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.692307692 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111715103843 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376209140582 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371191774273 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0625534089275 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352765505572 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.