Some cities do not restrict how stylish and unique can houses and offices be that people construct. Is this trend positive or negative?
Recently, there is no limit of style in constructing the offices as well as houses in some cities. In my opinion, this trend could be a positive development for some reasons.
Firstly, the sole houses could enable the cities to absorb tourists from other places. Indeed, these houses, which are designed with the original architecture, could become one of the most wonderful sites in the cities. For example, when visiting Danang city, tourists can not bypass the diverse house where people would enjoy some amazing experiences. Moreover, without restriction in construction, new styles of buildings could be generated. Many architects freely design the accommodation in their own ways, resulting in the breakthrough of architecture.
Secondly, the unique offices could bring some advantages not only for employees but also authorities. If all offices in a city are built in the same shape and decoration, the worker can feel monotonous to work. Thus, people would be inspired to working more effectively when they work in a unique building. For instances, the large cooperation such as Google or Facebook always endeavor to create their own work environments, which are different from other companies, so they could engross in many talented people work for them. As a result, the companies could boost more quickly, impelling the grown of economics in the local.
In general, the house and the offices should be allowed to be constructed without limits in the design by the government to gain several benefits in the local.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-03 | drtruong92 | 90 | view |
| 2018-08-02 | quan1626 | 67 | view |
- Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that living in big cities is becoming more difficult. Others believe that it is getting easier. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Some cities do not restrict how stylish and unique can houses and offices be that people construct Is this trend positive or negative 67
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in general, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23577235772 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83373864197 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2051723833 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0769230769 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3846153846 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277689871136 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955522336702 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071564205349 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182777208973 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703070841101 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.