Some cities have few control over design and construction on housing and office buildings. People think that they are free to choose the design they like. Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages?
In some cities, citizens are allowed to design and construct civil and residential buildings with little or no controls from the authorities. This trend can create a diverse landscape to the city. However, I think it does more harm than good to the city.
On the one hand, having the freedom to design and build houses and office buildings can nurture people’s creativity and constructing skills. The more people contribute their ideas and effort to build their own city, the more materials, colours and shapes we can see around that city. For example, there might be one extraordinary idea that ends up being an iconic landmark for the city like the Eiffel Tower in Paris. In additional, there will be many architectural styles applied around the city that make it an interesting tourist attraction. More tourists coming to the city means more money to the businesses.
On the other hand, the lack of control from the government over designing and constructing buildings brings some drawbacks. Firstly, people may not understand the differences between a living and a working place. They may ignore the safety standards in design and construction leading to critical accidents to the builders and the people living under the roof later. Secondly, people might invade space for roads and important projects such as schools, hospitals, police stations, etc.
In conclusion, building city freely is a great trend but it is harmful to the city without guidance from the authorities and experts in design and constructions. The government should encourage it but also put in place some measures and standards to maintain safety for the people and reserve the beauty of the city.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10909090909 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73290085942 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589090909091 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4334674036 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.357142857 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281675041442 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877873757893 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788381348084 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156708305303 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300297760241 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.