Some cities have vehicle-free days when private cars, trucks and motorcycles are banned from the city center. People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses, taxis and metro on vehicle-free days. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In some urban areas, there is a rule called vehicle-free days which forbids citizens using their private transportations. This means that they are encouraged to switch to another modes of transport which is public ones. In my point of view, this policy would bring more benefits than downsides which I will examine in the following paper.
The first and foremost upside of implementing this event is partially contributing to the environmental protection. To clarify, trucks and motorcycles release a handsome amount of carbon dioxide which directly places heavy and deleterious effects on the atmosphere and causes global warming. Therefore, the temporary replacement of public transportation would likely to freshen the atmosphere leading to a reduction of air pollution. The second advantage of banning private vehicles is to facilitate the traffic flow. To be particular, when a large number of personal transportations moving in a gridlock, the severity of traffic snarl seems to be worsened. Hence, opting to use buses or taxis would result in a decrease of vehicle quantities operating on the roads and smoothen to transportation system.
Despite the aforementioned advantageous aspects, some noteworthy weaknesses of vehicle-free days can be examined. The first drawback is the delay arrival. This is because in some locations of a city, the public transportation system might be unable to provide a sufficient amount of support to satisfy the demands of traveling of residents there. Provided people commute to work but are forced to use buses or taxis, this can be a hindrance affecting their punctuality which is a minus point in their work efficiency. Another negativity of this trend is to place financial burdens on low-income earners. For example, the bus tickets or taxi fees in some developed areas are too pricey to be affordable for the disadvantaged. As a result, if these individuals are made to strictly follow this event, they may find it hard to comply as being unable to pay for such fees.
Taking everything into consideration, the act of enacting vehicle-free days can be regarded as beneficial for citizens because of contributing to preserve the environment along with improving the traffic congestions. However, there are some limitations that need to be considered which are the negative impacts on punctuality of workers as well as its insolvency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-27 | nguyen thanh sang | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | too3ig | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | too3ig | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | minh phương phạm hồng | 89 | view |
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 67
- In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide co2 emissions per person in the united kingdom sweden italy and portugual between 1967 and 2007 73
- Some cities have vehicle free days when private cars trucks and motorcycles are banned from the city center People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses taxis and metro on vehicle free days Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people think that to learn about other countries they need to travel Some say that it is not necessary to travel we can have information through TV and internet Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...he traffic flow. To be particular, when a large number of personal transportations moving in a gr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, well, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33687002653 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16978457978 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57824933687 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7341956022 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9444444444 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235699843395 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712609536433 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728285845875 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141291656127 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027000736857 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.