In some companies, a typical working week has been reduced to 30 hours. Do the advantages outweigh the demerits?
A reduction of working weekly time to 30 hours impacts several firms experiencing low incomes and a quality decline of product. However, the cons are more influence than the pros.
Positively, the demerit of working of 30 hours in a week for companies is to increase workers productivity due to more sleeping time. Nevertheless, the demerit is more detrimental because of experiencing a profit decline since the firms cannot achieve sales targets. For example, In 2018, PT. Erigo from Indonesia could not sell 12000 pieces in a year. Even though the design of the products was well-known as a result that the labors became more productive, not suffering sleep deprivation anymore, the cost production was about one billion rupiahs, being higher than the earned money at a half of the rupiahs spent.
Furthermore, working 30 hours in companies in seven days is the positive way to reduce work stress because employers have great family time. Nonetheless, the side effect is more negative, which the budget of workers’ salaries is bigger than allocation of machine maintenance to enhance goods’ quality, receiving complaint from customers. For instance, in 2020, PT. Sampoerna’s labors should be paid 2,5 million rupiahs per individual in a month, when this manufacturer focused on employee’s salary more than the money for fixing the tobacco maker machines at 1,5 million rupiahs, resulting that rarely were impurities cleaned, then it affected the taste of cigars decreasing, and buyers complained about the cigarettes. Therefore, this weekly typical activities in a work place bring more bad influences instead of good ones.
In conclusion, 30-hour workweek reveals more weighty disadvantages than the advantages for companies, witnessing profits shrunk and low quality of products. To avoid the demerits, firms have to calculate the outcome based on employers’ payment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-02 | bgs.id | 89 | view |
| 2022-02-07 | nur pitriyah etika | 71 | view |
| 2022-02-07 | nur pitriyah etika | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-08 | tegarangkasa | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-08 | naufalrahman96 | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries
- The chart below shows the percentage of people accessing news via different media in one country in 2013 2015 and 2017 79
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, nevertheless, nonetheless, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41156462585 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91139971877 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636054421769 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.0113785434 49.4020404114 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.642857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196832084341 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681767468433 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941356303679 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120962225664 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203258669515 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.